Reblogged from spontaneouscombustionlanguageimagelab:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

jhina alvarado / arthaus: sf

...caught a peek:

Jhina Alvarado's CANDID MOMENTS at ArtHaus / san francisco this afternoon and am impressed by the use of encaustic ( a medium I am not particularly  fond of) in a subtle, yet powerful way; encasing ghosts of memory of anonymous yet familiar figures in squares almost  apologetic, nearly pornographic; shameful, comical and sad; distanced members of a familial clan disguised and distorted and for all that identifiable as gestures of passing modes of aspiration and behavior, of values hoisted and flagging...

Read more… 79 more words

jhina alvarado / arthaus: sf
…caught a peek:
Jhina Alvarado’s CANDID MOMENTS at ArtHaus / san francisco this afternoon and am impressed by the use of encaustic ( a medium I am not particularly  fond of) in a subtle, yet powerful way; encasing ghosts of memory of anonymous yet familiar figures in squares almost  apologetic, nearly pornographic; shameful, comical and sad; distanced members of a familial clan disguised and distorted and for all that identifiable as gestures of passing modes of aspiration and behavior, of values hoisted and flagging… failed and sealed now in wax seen in pitiable review in the blacked out eyes of shielded archaic cultural  aspirants to the fame of family, of place; the pose at the beach with the baby, the grinning congratulatory beauty queens: falseness/glamor/fame/  the posture of invented personality come to mind…bravo Ms Alvarado…
CANDID MOMENTS @ ArtHaus
through December 29, 2012
411 Brannan Street
415-977-0223
jAlvarado_Family.jpg
jAlvarado_ThePhotographer.jpg
https://www.facebook.com/carl.heyward?ref=tn_tnmn#!/media/set/?set=a.1547764049191.2081695.1087765202&type=3

Reblogged from spontaneouscombustionlanguageimagelab:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

 

Francesca woodman / cindy

sherman :


(defy depict describe

despair decline) 

san francisco museum of modern art exhibitions

woodman: November 5-February 2012  

  sherman: July 14 -October 8, 2012

 

 

"CINDY SHERMAN IS A MAGAZINE /

FRANCESCA WOODMAN IS A

DIARY..."

The difference between the photography

based art of Francesca Woodman and that of

Cindy Sherman is the difference between…

Read more… 1,263 more words

 

Francesca woodman / cindy
sherman :


(defy depict describe

despair decline) 

san francisco museum of modern art exhibitions
woodman: November 5-February 2012  
  sherman: July 14 -October 8, 2012

 

 
“CINDY SHERMAN IS A MAGAZINE /
FRANCESCA WOODMAN IS A
DIARY…”

The difference between the photography

based art of Francesca Woodman and that of

Cindy Sherman is the difference between

cemetery and circus; depth and superficiality;

the smell of sweat and the smell of grease

paint. Both address the perception of reality

and identity with vastly differing means and

intention, and their results, their oeuvre,

present a challenge to the viewer to either

gawk at freak show embracing the novel, the

oddity; shed tear and raise glass at funeral or

wake or to dismiss the entire enterprise as, in

the case of Woodman, personal self-

indulgence, a peek into the process of great

nascent potential cut short by suicide at age

22, or Sherman’s indulgences joyfully

misrepresenting self as others, with varying

degrees of success throughout a long and

celebrated career.

There is great sympathy for the “tragedy” of Francesca Woodman, her family of practicing myopic artists, lack of (perhaps) the necessary care and attention due any child, her severe emotional issues and, of course, the seemingly inevitable leap to her death in Manhattan in 1981. That sympathy, a sentiment fueled by “knowing” gets in the way of appreciating her brief but powerful output uninfluenced by her end, which is a bit like saying look at SUNFLOWERS and not think of Van Gough’s ear, or Caravaggio’s bacchanalian nature or his florid death or try to consider Carl Andre’s tremendous post-modernist contributions without thinking of the circumstances surrounding the violent demise of his wife.
The trappings of the artist, biography, philosophy, lifestyle, and eccentricities understandably “shadow”, to a degree, any absolute and serious consideration of the remaining plastic artifact for better and for worse.
The merit of an individual or body of work is greatly influenced by what we know or think we know of its creation and the circumstances around the perceived processes of the artist, always absent yet attached to the material; dissected and dragged along by our excitements and expectations seeking a “full aesthetic experience” in the gallery tour, the i-pod description, the convincing banter and conspiratorial tone of the volunteer museum docent; in the pages of Art in America or The National Enquirer , what’s the difference? Obscuring is obscuring, high or lowbrow, nationally endowed or cafe table gossip, we are left with great forests and few trees.

If Cindy Sherman were

you mother:

what shade of lipstick

would she wear,

how funny is her hair,

how about her

teeth? is her attitude

delicious? is there

a malignant gaze in her

eyes? (if not,

why not?)

If you were Francesca

Woodman: from

under what shadow are

you

emerging? into what

corner are you

absorbed? are you naked?

are you

mad?

are you glad to be

sad? (if not,

why not?)

The idea of provocation, that art must be

provocative to have worth, that there be

elements of the confrontational and, perhaps,

a bit mean-spirited is essential to considering

Cindy Sherman and her genre of physio-

psychic embodiment, dress up, make believe,

fashion and fantasy as mirror of personality

and reality.

Her body is a cultural document

in the way that Pat Olezko’s is “an art

playground” or Carolee Schneemann’s or

Marina Abramovic’s may be viewed as

battleground of social, class and gender

issues. It is no mistake that she is coupled

here with women artists primarily active in

performance art because at the core, her work

is performance, which can also be argued as

seminal to the work of Woodman as well.

                            

SHERMAN: ” who are you

when you think I am someone

else?”

The survey of her exhibition at SFMOMA (july 14-oct 8, 2012) allows a mapping of her work, (both telling as well as disturbing) development and embrace by the arts establishment, beginning with small modest gems of her early output of complete, beautifully rendered black and white images that recall the dissected stark and foreign familiarity of reality of an Arbus sans the deliberate or coveted “freak show” element. What is remarkable about this series of work is the great care and balance of image content, execution and quality of printmaking, truly superior in many ways to what would follow, but who among us has the courage to say “no” to the demands of career and expectation? Admittedly, her goals have remained constant, that is undeniable : to shock, entertain and mesmerize; to transport self and viewer into space safe enough to gawk and marvel.
                                            

There is great complexity in this period in that the relationship seems more authentic, more intimacy between subject and viewer; there is a movie going on and it’s upfront and personal in the immediacy and directness of black and white; it works or they bomb…these work. There is no interference of color or glamor; of grimace, nod-wink or distorting prosthetics or the other distractions that mar her later work. These simple poignant images demand a perfection of execution lacking in current work and is rarely revisited except, perhaps, in 1981′s group of often soft-focus reclining, musing, fretting teens, housewives and tortured dames; they seem authentic and are presented without judgment, no snickering or snorting at feeble attempts to simply “be”.

Yes, she can look like a Vanderbilt, soccer mom, nut job, hippie, secretary, body part, groupie, spinster, wastrel, clown, man, courtesan or saint, and so what? The soul of the thing has long been lost and has been reduced to a lavish dress up party, the inside joke and the ability of an actress without a script to successfully embody the surface of the perception of another without engaging its soul. She does it well; she does it consistently and has no reason to assess nor embrace that loss, though she’s mentioned that the portraits of murder, disembowelment and “more disgusting” pictures developed as a reaction to her “guilt” after being accepted/collected so quickly. Oh well.

The problems surrounding Woodman have been mentioned, mainly the insertion of sentiment onto distinctly non-sentimental images created by a fiercely unsentimental artist. Her independence, grounded by an aesthetic, a confidence of style, subject and working technique remain a joy to behold thirty years after her death as we peek into timeless grim fairy tales all too real despite their cloak of hiding or emerging or disappearing all together.

WOODMAN: ” …don’t look at

me; please look at me…”

Silence guides her work. The spaces in her spare environments embrace the emotional landscape and clear way for an uncomfortable rendering of familiar yet frightening feelings, usually coolly portrayed by her own naked or loosely clothed body. She, like Sherman, consciously provoke and seeks to shock, to be apart from the crowd (art students and nascent art -photography strictures) to explore just how far the depiction of “self” might go and lead; into dreams and demons, freedom and hopefully, fame.
I don’t see her comfortable, but restless, thrilled by the technical discoveries of primitive video, performance and slow shutter speeds; of juxtaposition and time and motion studies; she is depicting the hallucination and is being claimed by it as well in rough, magical images that survive as glimpses of simultaneous private universes, individual to each of is, unique to Woodman, witnessed by her survivors.
 
Finally, Sherman is.
Woodman was/is and remains:
 
Our choice is to pander either to an anti-intellectual, wholly cynical interpretation of “the importance of being” (impotence ?) a’ la Sherman and pop cultures’ short circuitry through reduction of our best impulses or to empathize with Woodman’s attempt to make lasting an ephemeral experience universally witnessed though rarely claimed.
 
Carl Heyward
is a writer/ artist living in san francisco
his BUS PORTRAIT (distortion) SERIES and MIXED-MEDIA paintings and collage will be exhibited in Lecce, Italy curated by Monica Lisi April 2012.

Maria Allocco / Haunting Harvest

THE BLOOM:

a fall gathering of bay area writers

Progressive Grounds

san francisco

10/11/12

Ventured out into the early evening greeted by a fog and rain, a gloom appropriate to the season and bussed and waited and bussed again into the Mission District full of ghosts of night rides past, not all malignant, not all tame.

Progressive Grounds, a conscious cafe and

community arts center, created THE BLOOM

produced by 14 Black Poppies, hosted by writer

Nayomi Munaweera.

Women of color gathered to say, to sing the praises and trials of existence; writers in an electronic age; paper over plastic,you might say.

My head full of the voices of dot-com.ers in plaid and back packs on the way over, manically and matter-of-factly talking of launches, platforms and unusual demographics, and for all their obscure futuristic chatter and electronic strategies, it can all be reduced to yuppie con-men fronting a company that

makes pay-day loanspay-day-loans, and for all

their self-satisfied pea-under-the shell-gaming,

Willie Loman lives still-born in their hearts as

lousy, as losing as lost as that doomed character

only wearing younger, more pampered skin.

I am here for Maria,

Maria Allocco, a friend and a great dramatic writer,

an inhabitor of words; mercifully, she is first, (this

is unfair because the words of all the women are

worth the ink), my time is limited and there is a

long night of work ahead for me.

I am here for Maria and for her I stay.

“Stay”, for me:

suspend thinking / smile / remain open / don’t judge/ there’s a nice woman seated next to me; she’s asked me to guard her chair while she grabs something to drink /

Jason the proprietor is lively, excitable, sincere;

this is forward and way back time all at once…hey

Carl, it is only THIS time and shut down the brain

( a sometimes decidedly bad neighborhood)…and

to an extent, I do.

When I do, I am fully “there” and surprisingly having a good time; don’t have to work so hard to ignore anything; people are genuinely kind and interested in the going’s on; I can momentarily put the fear away if I choose, and I choose to.

Maria is introduced, and as alphabetical “first” is first to break the ice, to test the mike, to feel herself and the crowd and she does that as any sacrificial lamb must do. Her voice is clear and she is among friends, she is in her element. She will find her way.

Half the opening poem is done (MY BODY IS A RENTED ROOM), and she inhabits it, finally; her voice warms to the occasion, her back is straight, there is a widening stance, she, in leather boots and form-fitting dress, arrives full-on into the tone and pacing letting metaphors of heart, hair and limbs shape the movement of the words and the convoluted terms of issue of the flesh takes form in words and meaning and soothes the audience letting us in by means of trust and assurances that we have arrived and the lamb will rest in peace for the remainder of the night.

Nothing is disposable and there is great victory in the dance, the movement of voice to sound; the voice, the movement, the words; the reader lost in the words, smiling the words, coaxing the words; what we pluck of meaning and identification from a cafe air , it too, resting in peace of forgotten espresso machine gurgle and counter top slaps: Maria has offered herself, her first words her body/ mind/ presence/ intention/ voice to sanctify this Mission space.

It is the season of the witch, of harvest and loss and gain and gathering, of assessing what has brought us here; what has borne us through the door of memory and experience.

Allocco’s  STORY OF MY BIRTH recalls, with profound

insight, birth as redemption and karmic

prerogative; birth as horror show where we/she

pays them dues, even as we arrive, for past

transgressions and transgressions in the past of

our progenitors wholly, claimed and laid at the

feet of the bearer: all of us, any of who

harvest/gather; are harvested/gathered (in her

case, via mechanical intervention) through whim

of the men in white with savior complexes, who

make it up as they go, in this, a life or death

matter, a birth of pain into pain ending in pain and

repeated; of obedience’s to the doctors and fathers

and priests who are all doctors, fathers,

executioners and priests to any one of us who

contemplate whether to “pull the plug” on the

other, the dreamer, the iconoclast, the helpless,

the frail: any one of us

Maria reminds us of systems larger than ourselves that mightily miss the mark, likely to overlook the labored breath of a dreamer transitioning as best they can from death to sleep to life again.

 

Carl Heyward

artspeak/sf

Steve Simmons:
                                                               Steven Simmons
……..ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES……………
-Steven Simmons-
  ………ELEVEN NOTES ON JOAN STENNICK, CARL HEYWARD, AND THE DEATH OF CY TWOMBLY   
                                                                                    -Steven Simmons-
                                                                           
                                                                                     by
                   – Steven Simmons-

Carl Heyward: UNTITLED / mixed media on board / 11" x 12.75" / 2011

ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVE ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVE ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES …..

  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES …………………………………

                                                                    

                            Joan Stennick / MARCH #2 / Bonnafont Gallery San Francisco / 2011

1.

An exhibition of works by Joan Stennick and Carl Heyward opened at the Bonnafont Gallery in San Francisco the day after Cy Twombly died at the age of 83 in Rome.

Stennick’s paintings face Heyward’s mixed-media pieces across the space of the gallery, and the show is arresting, in part, because it sets up a fascinating dialogue about how two very different contemporary artists respond to, learn from, incorporate, and move beyond the work of their predecessors, especially, for both Stennick and Heyward, their great American mid-century moder

nist predecessors.  Which is where Cy Twombly comes in.

         

2.

The Red and the Black

Or Vice Versa

          Sennick’s half of the exhibition at the Bonnafont is dominated by her three most recent paintings, complexly worked canvasses that are predominantly black.  Heyward’s half of the exhibit is dominated by three pieces that feature images of coca cola bottles painted bright lipstick red.   Heyward’s fascination – obsession? – with coke also figures in much of his other work here.  Five more of his thirteen pieces in the exhibit feature over-sized fragments of the elegantly cursive “Coca Cola” brand logo, all of which are also painted lipstick red.

          Joan Stennick’s paintings, and it’s important to emphasis that word when discussing Stennick, are large, totally abstract, and richly textured.  Heyward’s pieces are relatively small, flat, and composed mainly of found and mechanically reproduced images juxtaposed against one another.  Words, marks, and scribbles also feature prominently in Heyward’s work; and, in a very different context, marks and scribbles also appear in Stennick’s paintings.  Which is again where Cy Twombly comes in.

3.

          Art historians often credit Cy Twombly (who came from Virginia), along with his friends Robert Rauschenberg (who came from Texas) and Jasper Johns (who came from South Carolina), with breaking, in the 1950s and 1960s, the dominance of abstract expressionism in American art.  These southern boys became the three major transitional figures between the work of DeKooning, Pollack, Kline et.al. and the often radically different work done in the latter half of the twentieth century.  Rauschenberg and Johns paved the way for pop art with which Twombly has almost nothing in common, but Twombly, along with his two friends, greatly influenced other later movements such as neo-Dadaism, minimalism, conceptualism, neo-Expressionism, and graffiti art.  Twombly, however, unlike Rauschenberg and Johns, remained a predominantly non-representational painter throughout his long career, and viewed from a different angle, he can be seen as continuing abstract expressionism and can be ranked, along with Joan Mitchell (an extraordinarily underrated artist), as one of the two most brilliant and important “second generation” exemplars of that tradition.  Which is where Joan Stennick comes in.  She can also be seen in part, but, as is the case with Twombly, only in part, as an abstract expressionist, by now “third”– or would it be “fourth” or “fifth”? – generation variety.  She demonstrates how much pictorial energy and emotional power are still possible in the kind of bold, risk-taking abstraction she practices, how vital and contemporary the tradition of gestural painting remains.

                                                                                          

Joan Stennick: MAY #1 / oil on canvas / 56" x 56" / 2011

4.

Black

          I’ve linked Stennick to mid-century modernist art, but her 2011 “black” paintings are very different from famous “black” paintings of the 1950s and 1960s, including Ad Reinhardt’s elegantly precise abstractions, Frank Stella’s early, minimal canvases, and a Rauschenberg black painting, intended more as a Dadaist and Oedipal gesture, like his “Erased DeKooning,” than a self contained work of art.   Nor do Stennick’s black paintings and a companion piece that’s mainly gray have – except for their colors – much in common with Cy Twombly’s “Blackboard” paintings, which consist of white, chalk-like swirls of continuous circular patterns against gray or black backgrounds.

          Two of Stennick’s three black paintings, one square, the other hung vertically, at first glance pulsate with edgy, nervous energy.  Flat patches of paint stand against denser, more built up surfaces; vertical brushstrokes and marks, both large and small, meet and intersect with horizontal ones; glistening, light-reflecting areas of black weave in and out of more matte ones.   Nor are these paintings entirely black, especially the vertical one.  It’s shot through with smaller, poetic skeins and patches of pale color (white, silver, ochre) that at times appear like distant, flickering lights against a dark, dark ground.  What’s paradoxical about these two paintings is that with so much happening on so many complex pictorial levels each ultimately reads as a unified, even serene whole.  The same is true of another fine painting in the exhibit in which Sennick employs similar techniques, but in which, instead of black, she uses predominantly shades of gray. 

          In the most recent work in the exhibit and the largest of her black paintings, Stennick moves in a new direction.   At some edges of the canvas lines and brushstrokes of rust red and cement gray mix with black to form a sort of densely worked frame around a huge glistening black swirl across most of the painting, giving this piece, unlike the “overall” surfaces of most of Stennick’s work, a two dimensional perspective.  The vortex-like shape that dominates the painting is powerful, disorienting, frightening.

5.

Color

Color Fields

Three Stennick paintings in the exhibit offer a contrast to the neutral, mainly dark, palettes of the other four.  A small jewel from 2006 is composed of greenish gray and reddish orange brushstrokes that build up to form, especially toward the top and bottom of the canvas, vaguely grid-like patterns. 

Joan Stennick

 The other two “color” paintings were created this year.  One of these features thickly painted but rather loosely placed fields of bright, at times almost garish, autumnal hues, against which small black Twombly-like ovals skitter in irregularly placed vertical, horizontal, and diagonal clumps. 

The final Stennick painting in the exhibit is the most compositionally complex and the most beautiful.  Working in a four and a half feet square Stennick builds large areas of earth-like colors (tan, gray, white, pale green, taupe, rich gold, deep terra cotta) that fade in and out of one another, overlap, change directions.   Further pictorial movement is created by large and small marks of various shapes, by lines, both horizontal and vertical, etched into the paint, and by dripping bands of color cascading down the canvas in unexpected places and in varying lengths, some of them pencil-point thin, some  of them voluptuous.  Stennick mixes these many pictorial elements into a lyrical, exhilaratingly expansive, and fully resolved work of art.

Carl Heyward with UNTITLED (porn: apologies to manet) @ Bonnafont Gallery 2011

6.

          Carl Heyward does not hide his artistic influences.  His most obvious debts, unapologetically stated and visually played with here,

seem to be to Warhol, Rauschenberg, and Twombly.  However, Heyward’s sometimes ironic, sometimes nostalgic references to art history extend far beyond these mid-century Americans.  One of his collages features black and white reproductions of fragments of Manet paintings, another of tiny Renaissance figures, and a third of a repeated identification of a still life by Braque.  Heyward’s work also contains fragments of 19th and early 20th century photographs, anatomical drawings, and advertisements. There are visual references to op as well as to pop art, and several of his collages even have large patches of “found” abstract expressionist-like painting.    

                                                                                                                     

                        

7.

Red

          In contrast to Joan Stennick, who never uses primary colors, Carl Heyward gleefully exploits their eye-catching vibrancy.  The first images that one registers when walks into the Bonnafont Gallery are the previously mentioned bright red Coca Cola bottles, which have equally bright white lettering.  These immediately bring to mind Andy Warhol and his famous paintings of Coca Cola bottles.  This is clearly the intent, and a comparison of the ways in which Warhol and Heyward treat the same image is instructive.

Carl Heyward: UNTITLED (blue coca cola) /mixed media on board / 14" x 18" / 2011

The Coca Cola bottles in Heyward’s work are more expressionistic than realistic, including in their sizes and colors, and they’re placed irregularly against the canvas.   Warhol painted a few Coca Cola bottles that approach the stylization of Heyward’s, including one in red and white.  However, Warhol’s best and best known Coca Cola paintings are very, very different.  An iconic and typical painting from a series he painted in the 1960s, for example, consists of 210 bottles facing center and standing upright, as though on rows of invisible shelves. Thirty bottles stretch across the canvas vertically in seven horizontal rows, forming a precise geometrical grid.  Apparently silk-screened from a photograph, the bottles are identical, more or less “life” size, and “realistically” colored, brown liquid in pale greenish glass. 

In the largest of Carl Heyward’s Coca Cola pieces the bottles are also arranged in a grid, but it’s a grid as loose and rough as Warhol’s is precise and geometric.  Each of nine vertical rows contains two to three bottles or fragments of bottles placed horizontally on their sides in seemingly random directions and distances from one another.  The bottles are separated by very crudely delineated and uneven patches of white and black paint overlaid with gray, Twombly-like scratches. 

In the second and third works in this series the bottles float vertically across a white background.  The bottles vary greatly in size, and in color:  several have a heavy layer of whitewash on top of the red, and an oversize one that dominates one of the pieces has a blue and bottom and black neck.  There is a large black x shape on one canvas, and a number of the bottles have crude and unmistakably Twombly-like diagonal slashes across their middles. Heyward has mischievously introduced Twombly into pop art, a movement with which the artist had no connection during his life.  

Warhol’s Coca Cola paintings are brilliantly deadpan, mechanical, repetitive. (Much of Warhol’s early and best work derives much of its power from repetition).  The bottles in Heyward’s work are playful, varied, and nostalgic in a way that Warhol’s were not.  Glass bottles containing carbonized beverages are from the past, as anachronistic as typewriters and long playing records and telephone booths.

                                                                                             

8.

Collages

          Most of the other ten works that Heyward is showing are small,

collages of found and manipulated material.  I’ve already noted the prominent visual role art history plays in many of these pieces.  Equally prominent is Heyward’s use of letters, words, and texts in a wide variety of forms and contexts, including the already mentioned fragments of the Coca Cola logo.  Also here are a post-it note (“Sherry wants this back, so don’t throw it away”), locations on a map, captions from a book on wildlife, Chinese calligraphy, sheets of stenographic shorthand notes, and pages from a Norwegian novel.  The last three texts noted are, of course, impossible for most viewers to “read,” while others, such as the post-it note, are intriguing in their de-contextualization.  In two of the collages, a single very largely drawn word, either standing alone (“porn”) or repeated (“negroes”), works not only in terms of its meaning but as a major visual compositional element, echoing not only the paintings of Twombly dominated by a single word, but those of many contemporary artists.

          9.          

          “untitled (shopping list/diptych),” whose “content” consists of nothing but words, is Heyward’s finest but also least typical collage.  It’s almost twice as large as the 11 by 12.75 inch size of the majority of the pieces here, and unlike them, it’s oriented horizontally. In contrast to the smaller collages, which are packed, at times overly packed, with images and words, “Shopping List” is composed of a single “found” object.  That object Is the back of a postcard, which in very small black letters identifies the (missing, unseen) front as a still life by George Braque. Sprawled across the postcard horizontally, whose size dwarfs and whose crude writing contrasts with the postcard’s mechanically lettered identification of the Braque painting, is a shopping  list (or a menu?) arranged in five vertically descending lines, with one item per line:

STRAWBERRIES

 MIRACLE WHIP

MEAT LOAF

MASHED POTATOES

SODA ROOT BEER

Heyward has blown up the postcard twenty times into a number of different sizes, manipulated the background color (some of the postcards are white, others are pale yellow), and arranged the wholes of some of these and only fragments of others into a roughly shaped grid in which the yellow and white cards alternate and sometimes overlap.  We see the original found image from multiple angles and perspectives, including upside down, in an excitingly original work that’s both primitive and immensely sophisticated, a down home version of synthetic cubism.

         

10.

Daddy Nostalgia

Heyward’s Coca Cola pieces speak of a vanished world, and his collages are also, as are all collages, nostalgic. That is, collages are, by definition, composed of pieces of the past, even if that past was only yesterday.  Moreover, the best of Heyward’s small collages are the two in which he most explicitly engages both social and personal history, “untitled (polka dot jack johnson)” and “untitled (negroes).”  (Carl Heyward is an African American.)   

untitled (polka dot jack johnson) mixed media on board / 2011

The first of these contains only a single representational image, a torn fragment of a faded photograph of Jack Johnson. This martyr of American sports and of miscegenation (how anachronistic that word seems today) is naked, muscled, bald, and beautiful, a white man’s nightmare vision of black male sexuality in the 1920s.  The dominant culture of his time tried to marginalize Jack Johnson, and in a mocking but sad take on that culture Heyward here literally marginalizes him visually.  The great boxer occupies less than a sixteenth of the entire collage and is cut off at its right margin: we see only the left half of his body from torso to head.  In a much larger area, about half of the collage, large black polka dots stand against uneven layers of white, referencing not only the visual dynamics of op art and the ben gay dots of comic books and of Lichtenstein, but the remarks that Sammy Davis Jr., another martyr/hero of “miscegenation,” allegedly made in the 1950s about the absurdity of “labeling” the children of interracial couples.  The left half of Heyward’s collage consists of intersecting patches of abstract expressionist-like brushstrokes that recall the agon of that movement and of its relationship to jazz and the blues.  “The blues” is reiterated by midnight blue brushstrokes in this part of the piece, and by lighter, rather psychedelic turquoise marks slashed across Jack Johnson’s body.  Formal tropes from mid-century American art brilliantly interact with an iconic photograph to create the historical, art historical, and sociological “meaning” of this collage.

The word “negroes,” repeated three times vertically on a torn sheet of dirty white paper that’s covered in the kind of cheap plastic that used to protect photographs in old family albums is one of two primary compositional elements in a piece that is simpler but just as emotionally resonant as the Jack Johnson one.  These words on paper occupy about half of the collage’s pictorial space and collide with fragments of a late nineteenth or early twentieth century sepia-tinted photograph that could have been and probably was pasted in such an album.  As in the Jack Johnson collage, Heyward uses a single representational image, but here fragments of that image appear three times, echoing the tripling of the word “negroes.” Cut off at the left margin is an unsmiling but open and serene face haloed by longish, curly hair, and two smaller fragments of this hair and of body parts (a neck, an ear) appear towards the center and bottom of the collage. The face is mesmerizing because of its beauty, but, also and more importantly, because of its ambiguity.  This could be a man, a boy, a woman, a young girl.  Because of the collage’s word(s) we initially assume that the person pictured is black, but closer visual examination makes us question this assumption: he or she might be Caucasian, Asian, Native American, or of mixed race. These ambiguities and the torn fragments of the work’s making speak to a tragic loss of identity throughout U.S. history, perhaps especially among “negroes.”  Yet paradoxically Heyward’s haunting collage also captures an historic leap, the blurring and increasing disappearance of fixed social, sexual, and ethnic roles in contemporary America, the way we live and think and see now. 

11.

          Some Lists

(after John Ashbery)

May #1.  April #1.  April #2.  Joan Stennick.

untitled (shopping list). Carl Heyward.

Untitled.  Cy Twombly.

Nature Morte.  George Braque.

Morte.  Andy Warhol.  Joan Mitchell.  Robert Rauschenberg. 

Dead at the age of 83 in Rome. Cy Twombly.

Joan Stennick: APRIL #3 (detail) /oil on canvas / 40" x 30" /2011

……..ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES……………
……..ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES……………
……..ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES……………

carl HEYWARD joan STENNICK (bonnafont GALLERY sf 2011)

……..ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES……………
Steve Simmons:
is the author of  BODY BLOWS and AMERICAN NIGHT; his work has appeared in ARTFORUM and PARTISAN REVIEW; he is former art and architecture critic of the SF BAY GUARDIAN.        
                                                  

……..ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES N NOTES  ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES ELEVEN NOTES……………

all content copyright ( simmons/stennick/heyward) 2011

artspeak

spontaneous combustion: language/image lab

THE GAP IS NEAR

(this is a flash of experience):

“black friday”

or “the selling of plague materials”or

“inflated dreams at a discount”

In much I don’t participate: lap dance/voter fraud/home surgical kits/ use of public toilets, etc…the list grows as I grow older and that’s ok, this is what maturity is about:

experience/knowledge/compassion/wisdom/ applying those lessons on more or less a daily basis, and not necessarily in that order.

What counts is managing the neurosis, the insect-fear of loss and wreck, the failing body, unwanted social contact, someone yelling in the bushes, falling in the subway, the seagull drop from tainted skies.


Shopping paralysis is what this is about:  the consumption of goods and materials, dressing the part, shopping the part, dropping cash for lack of credit, qualifying for the consumer echelon and wearing it well, bearing in mind the hustle, flim-flam, look of hurried anticipation on streets where coat, tie and gloves( proper dress) was demanded in golden gate 1950′s past. Look of a civilized well groomed man, clean socks clean underwear. Got to have it, got to buy it, go downtown.


Yes, the internet.


Yes, the shopping mall.


Yes, catalog order.

Yes to all of that, but don’t deny me my dose of poison of a black friday gone to market, debit card in hand an optimistic list (black courduroy shirt, discounted caps and winter wear at a bargain or bust).

There is movement on market street, the vendors hawking their wares, word-up shirtless dye jobs working gymnastics  next to placards proclaiming “the end is near”, full promises of satisfaction and the lions share of rite of hipness, all on sale all at bargain prices all available to me…what do I not need, but can’t live without? Mine is a major brain lock and yet I press on; Claus and Heidi in from Berlin digging euro-dollar advantage and countless oblivious kids, some in designer strollers that look like mini-space ships or colorful crypts on wheels. I’m managing the side-step falling into Gap front door

and enter the feverish scene of mundane hell: “zip-zip” shoppers, nearly invisible clerks, a salesman in Dennis the Menace little-boy tight tan pants rolled to top of ankle and the wrinkled look of seasons past, sweaty christmas music, wack renditions of silent night and electronic versions of vocorder disco pop: Mary J. Blige on the north pole…a whirl of color full of sound and fury, color and fabric, a blur of motion of frantic shoppers, a check-out line that looks like 1930′s Depression relief cues…I do the mental math see this or that ask about the size for an item dodge pirouetting shoppers or edge around the standing -still shopper gone rigid and mute, sensory overload acute.

I’m thinking about age, the treat to see, buzz through and go; a memory of

Hecht Department Store in D.C. youth; a hot dog treat, candy cane, scary Santa, the sound of “no”, and a snow-bound ride home on stifling street cars of holiday desire and winter disease.

Black Friday to you too.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,808 other followers